June 07, 2025
11 11 11 AM
Bounce Back From Flat Hair With These Summer Volumizing Essentials
Body of Thai hostage recovered from Gaza, Israel says
Kate Hudson On Playing The “Long Game” With Blended Family Dynamic
Manhunt Underway for Dad of 3 Missing Daughters Found Dead
Benny Blanco Reacts to Selena Gomez Wedding Date Rumors
Cologne evacuates 20,000 so WW2 bombs can be defused
Ferris Bueller’s Day Off Star Returns to Red Carpet After 15 Years
Sean “Diddy “ Combs’ Trial: Why R. Kelly Was Name-Dropped in Court
Accio Style! Alex and Ani’s Best-Kept Secret Is Harry Potter Jewelry
Rihanna’s Dad Ronald Fenty Dead at 70
Latest Post
Bounce Back From Flat Hair With These Summer Volumizing Essentials Body of Thai hostage recovered from Gaza, Israel says Kate Hudson On Playing The “Long Game” With Blended Family Dynamic Manhunt Underway for Dad of 3 Missing Daughters Found Dead Benny Blanco Reacts to Selena Gomez Wedding Date Rumors Cologne evacuates 20,000 so WW2 bombs can be defused Ferris Bueller’s Day Off Star Returns to Red Carpet After 15 Years Sean “Diddy “ Combs’ Trial: Why R. Kelly Was Name-Dropped in Court Accio Style! Alex and Ani’s Best-Kept Secret Is Harry Potter Jewelry Rihanna’s Dad Ronald Fenty Dead at 70

Study Finds Forever Chemicals Are More Toxic As Mixtures

A first-of-its-kind study has measured the toxicity of several types of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), better known as “forever chemicals,” when mixed together in the environment and in the human body.

The good news: Most of the tested chemicals’ individual cytotoxicity and neurotoxicity levels were relatively low. 

The bad news: The chemicals acted together to make the entire mixture toxic.

“Though they are structurally similar, not all forever chemicals are made equal — some are more potent, others less. When mixed, all components contributed to the mixture’s cytotoxicity and neurotoxicity,” says the study’s first-author, Karla Ríos-Bonilla, a UB chemistry PhD student.

“In the laboratory assays we used in this study, most of the types of PFAS that we tested did not appear to be very toxic when measured individually. However, when you measure an entire sample with multiple PFAS, you see the toxicity,” adds study co-author Diana Aga, SUNY Distinguished Professor, director of the RENEW Institute and Henry M. Woodburn Chair in the Department of Chemistry.

This research was conducted in collaboration with Beate Escher of the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany, where Ríos-Bonilla did the in vitro toxicity experiments in the high-throughput screening facility CITEPro. It was published Sept. 11 in Environmental Science and Technology, a journal of the American Chemical Society.

The study is novel in that it assesses mixture toxicity of PFAS. These synthetic compounds have been widely used in consumer products — from nonstick pans to makeup — for decades, and they can take hundreds to thousands of years to break down, if ever. They are estimated to be in at least 45% of the nation’s drinking water and in the blood of practically every American, and they have been linked to cancer and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Earlier this year, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the first-ever drinking water standards for six kinds of PFAS. However, it is estimated that there are over 15,000 varieties present in the environment. Only a handful of these chemicals have standards and are regulated. 

“There are six PFAS that can be regulated because we know a lot about them and their toxicity. Unfortunately, we cannot regulate other forms of PFAS until their toxicities are known,” says Aga, who is principal investigator of the EPA STAR grant that funded the research. “We need to set maximum contamination levels for each PFAS that is proportional to their toxicity. To regulate contaminants, it is crucial to know their relative potencies when they occur as mixtures in the environment, along with their predicted environmental concentrations.” 

Other co-authors from UB are G. Ekin Atilla-Gokcumen, Dr. Marjorie E. Winkler Distinguished Professor and associate chair of the Department of Chemistry, and Judith Cristobal, senior research scientist.

Ríos-Bonilla is also supported by a graduate fellowship from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). 

To conduct the study, researchers created their own PFAS mixtures, one that is representative of an average American’s blood serum, and the other of surface water samples found in the U.S. Ríos-Bonilla used data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and from the U.S. Geological Survey to determine the average concentration ratios of PFAS in human blood and in surface water, respectively. 

They then tested these mixtures’ effects on two cell lines: one that tests for mitochondrial toxicity and oxidative stress, and the other for neurotoxicity.

Of the 12 PFAS spiked in the water mixture, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) — commonly used in nonstick pans and firefighting foam — was the most cytotoxic, making up to 42% of the mixture’s cytotoxicity.

On the other hand, both PFOA and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) contributed roughly the same cytotoxicity (25%) to the neurotoxicity assay, despite both contributing only 10 and 15% to the mixture in terms of concentration, respectively. 

The blood mixture had four PFAS present, but PFOA again was the most cytotoxic to both cell lines. Despite its molar contribution being only 29%, PFOA triggered 68% of the cytotoxicity in the cytotoxicity assay, and 38% in the neurotoxicity assay.

Interestingly, when researchers analyzed the toxicity of the extracts from real biosolid samples collected from a municipal wastewater treatment plant, very high toxicities were observed, despite the measured low concentrations of PFOA and other PFAS in the sample. 

“This means that there are many more PFAS and other chemicals in the biosolids, which have not been identified, that contribute to the toxicity of the extracts observed,” Aga says.

One of researchers’ goals was to determine if PFAS acts synergistically. This is when two or more chemicals’ combined effect is greater than the sum effect of the individual chemicals. However, their findings indicate that the effect of PFAS is concentration-additive: meaning that an established mixture toxicity prediction model can be used to predict the combined effect of mixtures. 

“As up to 12 PFAS in the mixtures acted concentration-additive for cytotoxicity and specific neurotoxicity, it is likely that the thousands of other PFAS that are in commerce and use are also acting in the same manner,” Escher says. “Mixtures pose more of a risk than individual PFAS. As they act and occur in mixtures, they ought to be regulated as mixtures.”

Researchers say the results of this study will also be very useful in assessing effectiveness of remediation efforts. Breaking down PFAS can sometimes create harmful byproducts that cannot be detected by chemical analysis, so measuring the toxicity of a sample after treatment may be the only way to judge whether a remediation technology is effective.

“Toxicity assays can be a complimentary tool when analytical chemistry doesn’t give you all the answers, especially when the identities of contaminants in the mixture are unknown, which is the case in many polluted sites,” Aga says.

62 thoughts on “Study Finds Forever Chemicals Are More Toxic As Mixtures”

  6. of course lije yourr website however you need to ake a look at tthe speelling on qukte a
    feew off your posts. A number of them aare rive
    with spelling issues andd I iin findcing iit vey troubnlesome to infrm tthe reality howver I’ll definitely comee avain again.

  7. Hey! Do youu know iff thy make anyy plutins tto assist witgh SEO?
    I’m trying to gett mmy blogg to rank ffor somke targeeted keywordds
    buut I’m not seeing vewry good success. If you kow oof aany please share.
    Kudos!

  9. Right heee iss the rkght web sote ffor everyone whho really wants tto ind outt about thhis topic.
    Youu understand a whole llot itss alnost tough to adgue with you (not thuat I resally woyld
    waqnt to…HaHa). Youu definitely put a new spin on a subjectt wwhich haas beenn discussed for ages.
    Excellent stuff, juist wonderful!

  10. I enjoy wwhat yoou guys arre ussually up too. Thiss soirt off clever work andd reporting!
    Keepp upp the woknderful woks guys I’ve addded yyou guys too
    blogroll.

  11. Havve you evrr thought about writing aan ebook orr gust aauthoring on other sites?
    I hve a bog cenhtered onn the sme information yyou discuss aand woulkd reall llike tto have yyou shar spme stories/information. I know my subscribers woulld enjoy your work.
    If you’re even remotely interested, feel frdee tto sesnd mee ann email.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *